A Progressive Training Framework for Robust YOLOv11-Based Vehicle Detection Across Domain Shifts in Real-World CCTV Environments

Authors

  • Aditya Gunaldhi Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia image/svg+xml Author
    • Budiman Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia image/svg+xml Author
      • Chairul Habibi Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia image/svg+xml Author
        • Nur Alamsyah Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia image/svg+xml Author

          DOI:

          https://doi.org/10.65780/bima.v1i5.27

          Keywords:

          YOLOv11, Progressive Training, Domain Adaptation, Vehicle Detection, Intelligent Transportation Systems

          Abstract

          The performance of deep learning-based vehicle detection models often deteriorates when applied to real-world CCTV environments due to domain shift caused by variations in lighting, occlusion, glare, and changes in camera viewpoint. This study aims to develop a YOLOv11-based progressive training framework to improve the model’s generalization ability under heterogeneous operational conditions. The proposed method consists of four stages: base training, fine-tuning, and a supervised progressive domain adaptation strategy implemented through sequential fine-tuning on labeled target-domain CCTV images before OpenVINO-based inference optimization. The model is trained using a source dataset and adapted to a target dataset representing real-world CCTV conditions. Evaluation was conducted using Precision, Recall, mAP@50, mAP@50–95, loss curve analysis, per-vehicle-class evaluation, visual testing on CCTV video, as well as latency and throughput measurements. The results show that base training achieved an mAP@50 of 0.919 and built a robust feature representation, while fine-tuning maintained performance stability with an mAP@50 of 0.915. Although domain adaptation reduced mAP@50 to 0.811 due to domain shift, the model demonstrated improved generalization capabilities and maintained more consistent detection under low-light conditions, glare, occlusion, and heavy traffic. OpenVINO INT8 optimization increased inference speed from 4.86 FPS to 9.08 FPS with minimal accuracy loss. These findings demonstrate that the progressive training framework effectively bridges differences in data distribution while producing a vehicle detection model that is more robust, efficient, and suitable for deployment in real-time CCTV-based traffic monitoring systems.

          Downloads

          Download data is not yet available.

          References

          [1] C. Gheorghe, M. Duguleana, R. G. Boboc, and C. C. Postelnicu, “Analyzing Real-Time Object Detection with YOLO Algorithm in Automotive Applications: A Review,” CMES, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 1939–1981, 2024, doi: 10.32604/cmes.2024.054735.

          [2] M. Nikouei et al., “Small object detection: A comprehensive survey on challenges, techniques and real-world applications,” Intelligent Systems with Applications, vol. 27, p. 200561, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200561.

          [3] B.-S. Indonesia, “Number of Motor Vehicle by Type - Statistical Data.” Accessed: Jul. 11, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.bps.go.id/en/statistics-table/2/NTcjMg==/number-of-motor-vehicle-by-type--unit-.html

          [4] D. J. Marcelleno and M. P. K. Putra, “PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF YOLOV8 IN REAL-TIME VEHICLE DETECTION IN VARIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,” J. Tek. Inform. (JUTIF), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 269–279, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.52436/1.jutif.2025.6.1.3916.

          [5] I. Ashari, I. S. M. Negara, and A. S. S. A, “Lightweight YOLO Models for Real-Time Multi-Vehicle Detection,” SinkrOn, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1795–1810, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v9i3.15071.

          [6] R. J. Iskandar, C. Fatichah, and A. Yuniarti, “Object Detection in Low-Light Conditions: A Comparison using YOLOv5 and YOLOv8,” in 2024 4th International Conference of Science and Information Technology in Smart Administration (ICSINTESA), Balikpapan, Indonesia: IEEE, Jul. 2024, pp. 558–563. doi: 10.1109/ICSINTESA62455.2024.10748090.

          [7] S. Singh, R. Kumari, P. Pallavi, and P. Saurabh, “A systematic review of deep learning methods for low-light image enhancement and object detection,” Discov Appl Sci, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 241, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-08051-5.

          [8] J. Li, X. Wang, Q. Chang, Y. Wang, and H. Chen, “Research on Low-Light Environment Object Detection Algorithm Based on YOLO_GD,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 3527, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13173527.

          [9] A. Aldubaikhi and S. Patel, “Advancements in Small-Object Detection (2023–2025): Approaches, Datasets, Benchmarks, Applications, and Practical Guidance,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, no. 22, p. 11882, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/app152211882.

          [10] R. Saragih, I. Gultom, F. Ikorasaki, and T. M. Nainggolan, “Implementation of YOLOv8 for Object Detection in Urban Traffic Surveillance A Case Study on Vehicles and Pedestrians from CCTV Imagery,” Journal of ICT Aplications and System, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–25, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.56313/jictas.v4i1.430.

          [11] R. Juliansyah et al., “Development of a Real-Time Traffic Density Detection Website Using YOLOv8-Based Digital Image Processing with OpenCV,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2649–2678, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v6i4.912.

          [12] H. Wang and H. Qian, “SDG-YOLOv8: Single-domain generalized object detection based on domain diversity in traffic road scenes,” Displays, vol. 87, p. 102948, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2024.102948.

          [13] L. Folkman, K. A. Pitt, and B. Stantic, “A data-centric framework for combating domain shift in underwater object detection with image enhancement,” Appl Intell, vol. 55, no. 4, p. 272, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10489-024-06224-0.

          [14] S. Zhang, H. Tuo, J. Hu, and Z. Jing, “Domain Adaptive YOLO for One-Stage Cross-Domain Detection”.

          [15] A. Gomaa and A. Abdalrazik, “Novel Deep Learning Domain Adaptation Approach for Object Detection Using Semi-Self Building Dataset and Modified YOLOv4,” World Electric Vehicle Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 255, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/wevj15060255.

          [16] Y. Guo, Y. Yamamoto, H. Yaginuma, and Y. Taniguchi, “Vehicle detection in CCTV with global-guided self-attention and convolution,” Complex Intell. Syst., vol. 11, no. 10, p. 458, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40747-025-02073-7.

          [17] R. Khanam and M. Hussain, “YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements,” Oct. 23, 2024, arXiv: arXiv:2410.17725. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.17725.

          [18] Y. Wan and W. Zhu, “YOLO-PBE: An Improved YOLOv11 Vehicle Detection Algorithm for Complex Traffic Scenes,” CMC, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–10, 2026, doi: 10.32604/cmc.2026.084474.

          [19] A. K. Sarvaiya, M. K. Vala, B. R. Solanki, A. C. Rathod, and H. R. Khunt, “Size Synergistic Optimization of Preprocessing and Data Augmentation for Accelerated Convergence in YOLO11-based Vehicle Detection,” SSRG-IJECE, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 212–221, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.14445/23488549/IJECE-V13I4P117.

          [20] Z. Liu, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, and H. Song, “Robust Object Detection in Adverse Weather Conditions: ECL-YOLOv11 for Automotive Vision Systems,” Sensors, vol. 26, no. 1, p. 304, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.3390/s26010304.

          Downloads

          Published

          2026-07-31

          How to Cite

          A Progressive Training Framework for Robust YOLOv11-Based Vehicle Detection Across Domain Shifts in Real-World CCTV Environments. (2026). Bulletin of Intelligent Machines and Algorithms, 1(5), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.65780/bima.v1i5.27

          Most read articles by the same author(s)